1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1958 Nissan 211
To start off, 1958 Nissan 211 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1958 Nissan 211. (34 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1958 Nissan 211. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 605 kg more than 1958 Nissan 211. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Nissan 211. (67 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Nissan 211.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1958 Nissan 211 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | Tickford | 211 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 67 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2230 mm |