1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1959 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1959 Ford 12 M is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1959 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Tickford | 12 M |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1620 mm |
