1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1966 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 1966 Citroen 2CV is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 970 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1966 Citroen 2CV | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Citroen |
| Model | Tickford | 2CV |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2410 mm |
