1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1968 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 1968 Isuzu Bellel is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 235 kg more than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1968 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Isuzu |
Model | Tickford | Bellel |
Year Released | 1952 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1991 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 184 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2540 mm |