1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1971 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 1971 Lancia Fulvia is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Lancia Fulvia (115 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Lancia Fulvia should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 570 kg more than 1971 Lancia Fulvia.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Lancia Fulvia. (153 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Lancia Fulvia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1971 Lancia Fulvia | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Lancia |
| Model | Tickford | Fulvia |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1584 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2340 mm |
