1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1976 Citroen CX
To start off, 1976 Citroen CX is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Citroen CX (128 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 54 kg more than 1976 Citroen CX.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Citroen CX (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1976 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1976 Citroen CX | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Citroen |
Model | Tickford | CX |
Year Released | 1952 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 2347 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3110 mm |