1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240
To start off, 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240. (72 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240. (137 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1978 Mercedes-Benz 240 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Tickford | 240 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 2398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3430 mm |