1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1982 Ford Escort
To start off, 1982 Ford Escort is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1982 Ford Escort. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Escort. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 606 kg more than 1982 Ford Escort. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Escort. (137 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Escort.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1982 Ford Escort | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | Tickford | Escort |
Year Released | 1952 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 924 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2410 mm |