1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1982 Ford Granada
To start off, 1982 Ford Granada is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1982 Ford Granada. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 295 kg more than 1982 Ford Granada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Granada. (119 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1982 Ford Granada | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Tickford | Granada |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1591 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 119 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2780 mm |
