1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1984 BMW M6
To start off, 1984 BMW M6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,453 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 BMW M6 (286 HP) has 181 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1984 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 24 kg more than 1984 BMW M6.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 BMW M6 (334 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 1984 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1984 BMW M6 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | BMW |
| Model | Tickford | M6 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 3453 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 286 HP |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 334 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1506 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2840 mm |
