1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1984 Daihatsu Rocky
To start off, 1984 Daihatsu Rocky is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,765 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Daihatsu Rocky is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1984 Daihatsu Rocky. (87 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1984 Daihatsu Rocky. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Daihatsu Rocky weights approximately 30 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Daihatsu Rocky (211 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Daihatsu Rocky will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1984 Daihatsu Rocky | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Daihatsu |
Model | Tickford | Rocky |
Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 2765 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 211 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2540 mm |