1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1984 Peugeot Quasar
To start off, 1984 Peugeot Quasar is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Peugeot Quasar (600 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 495 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Peugeot Quasar should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Peugeot Quasar. (133 Nm). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Peugeot Quasar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1984 Peugeot Quasar | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Peugeot |
| Model | Tickford | Quasar |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1599 cc |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 600 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 133 Nm |
