1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1986 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1986 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 5,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 420 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1986 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
| Model | Tickford | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 5030 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3090 mm |
