1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1986 Renault 21
To start off, 1986 Renault 21 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1986 Renault 21. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 445 kg more than 1986 Renault 21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault 21. (129 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault 21.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1986 Renault 21 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | Tickford | 21 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 184 Nm | 129 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2670 mm |