1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1989 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1989 Lincoln Continental is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 110 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1989 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Lincoln |
| Model | Tickford | Continental |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2780 mm |
