1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1990 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1990 Jaguar XJ6 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Jaguar |
Model | Tickford | XJ6 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1990 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 3239 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 299 Nm |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2880 mm |