1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1990 Renault Laguna
To start off, 1990 Renault Laguna is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1990 Renault Laguna. (87 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Laguna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 525 kg more than 1990 Renault Laguna. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Laguna. (181 Nm). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Laguna.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1990 Renault Laguna | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
| Model | Tickford | Laguna |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1005 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2550 mm |
