1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (215 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 35 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (298 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
| Model | Tickford | Monte Carlo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 3350 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 215 HP |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2740 mm |
