1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 430 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
| Model | Tickford | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 2615 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2350 mm |
