1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1997 Daihatsu Move
To start off, 1997 Daihatsu Move is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1997 Daihatsu Move. (43 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1997 Daihatsu Move.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Daihatsu Move. (88 Nm). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Daihatsu Move.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1997 Daihatsu Move | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Daihatsu |
| Model | Tickford | Move |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 847 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 43 HP |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2350 mm |
