1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1997 Ford Windstar
To start off, 1997 Ford Windstar is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Windstar (200 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Windstar weights approximately 160 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1997 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Tickford | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1690 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1920 mm |
