1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz A
To start off, 1997 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1997 Mercedes-Benz A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1997 Mercedes-Benz A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 410 kg more than 1997 Mercedes-Benz A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mercedes-Benz A. (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mercedes-Benz A.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1997 Mercedes-Benz A | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Tickford | A |
Year Released | 1952 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1689 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 184 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2430 mm |