1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1999 Lexus RX
To start off, 1999 Lexus RX is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lexus RX (220 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lexus RX weights approximately 900 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lexus RX (301 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 1999 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1999 Lexus RX | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Lexus |
| Model | Tickford | RX |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 220 HP |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 301 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2630 mm |
