1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2000 Holden GTS-R
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 460 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2000 Holden GTS-R | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Holden |
Model | Tickford | GTS-R |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 184 Nm | 644 Nm |