1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2000 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Volkswagen Passat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volkswagen Passat (151 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Passat should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 176 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Passat.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volkswagen Passat (279 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2000 Volkswagen Passat will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2000 Volkswagen Passat | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Volkswagen |
Model | Tickford | Passat |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 2801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 279 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1354 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2710 mm |