1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2001 Ford F-650
To start off, 2001 Ford F-650 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 7,300 cc, 2001 Ford F-650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford F-650 (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford F-650 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 232 kg more than 2001 Ford F-650.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford F-650 (1,166 Nm) has 982 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2001 Ford F-650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2001 Ford F-650 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Tickford | F-650 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 7300 cc |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 1166 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1298 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 4930 mm |
