1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2001 Nissan Chappo
To start off, 2001 Nissan Chappo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,953 cc, 2001 Nissan Chappo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan Chappo (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Chappo should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 245 kg more than 2001 Nissan Chappo.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan Chappo (359 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan Chappo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2001 Nissan Chappo | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
| Model | Tickford | Chappo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 2953 cc |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2540 mm |
