1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2002 Bentley Arnage
To start off, 2002 Bentley Arnage is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Bentley Arnage weights approximately 920 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bentley Arnage (839 Nm) has 655 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2002 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2002 Bentley Arnage | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Bentley |
| Model | Tickford | Arnage |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 839 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3120 mm |
