1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2002 Dacia Supernova
To start off, 2002 Dacia Supernova is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2002 Dacia Supernova. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2002 Dacia Supernova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 580 kg more than 2002 Dacia Supernova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2002 Dacia Supernova | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Dacia |
Model | Tickford | Supernova |
Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |