1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2002 Honda Accord
To start off, 2002 Honda Accord is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Accord (157 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 97 kg more than 2002 Honda Accord.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda Accord (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2002 Honda Accord | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Honda |
Model | Tickford | Accord |
Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 2352 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1433 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2690 mm |