1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2002 Honda Step Wagon
To start off, 2002 Honda Step Wagon is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2002 Honda Step Wagon. (67 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Step Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 690 kg more than 2002 Honda Step Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Step Wagon. (119 Nm). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Step Wagon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2002 Honda Step Wagon | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Honda |
| Model | Tickford | Step Wagon |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 119 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2680 mm |
