1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2004 Caterham 7
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 1060 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2004 Caterham 7 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Caterham |
Model | Tickford | 7 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2230 mm |