1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2004 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (195 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 692 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (353 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2004 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
Model | Tickford | Express |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 353 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2222 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3440 mm |