1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2004 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2004 GMC Yukon is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Yukon (325 HP) has 220 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1074 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Yukon (495 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2004 GMC Yukon | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | GMC |
| Model | Tickford | Yukon |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 5964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 325 HP |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2604 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3310 mm |
