1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2004 Honda Life
To start off, 2004 Honda Life is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2004 Honda Life. (47 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2004 Honda Life. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 740 kg more than 2004 Honda Life. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda Life. (58 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda Life.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2004 Honda Life | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Honda |
Model | Tickford | Life |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2370 mm |