1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2005 Chrysler Pacifica
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica (251 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 538 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica (339 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Pacifica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2005 Chrysler Pacifica | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Chrysler |
| Model | Tickford | Pacifica |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2068 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2960 mm |
