1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak (820 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 636 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
Model | Tickford | Kodiak |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 6600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 184 Nm | 820 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2000 mm |