1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2006 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2006 Ford Bantam is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2006 Ford Bantam. (94 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Bantam weights approximately 1326 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Bantam. (137 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2006 Ford Bantam | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | Tickford | Bantam |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2670 mm |