1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2006 Honda Civic
To start off, 2006 Honda Civic is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Civic (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda Civic. (167 Nm @ 1000 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2006 Honda Civic | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Honda |
| Model | Tickford | Civic |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1339 cc |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2710 mm |
