1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2007 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac DTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac DTS (276 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac DTS (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2007 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
Model | Tickford | DTS |
Year Released | 1952 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 4565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2940 mm |