1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2007 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2007 Holden Commodore is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 135 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2007 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2007 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Holden |
Model | Tickford | Commodore |
Year Released | 1952 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 184 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |