1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2008 Honda HR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 273 kg more than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2008 Honda HR-V | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Honda |
| Model | Tickford | HR-V |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1257 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2460 mm |
