1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2008 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2008 Nissan Rogue is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Rogue (170 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 418 kg more than 2008 Nissan Rogue.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2008 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | Tickford | Rogue |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 184 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1112 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2700 mm |