1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2008 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2008 Renault Kangoo is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2008 Renault Kangoo. (74 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2008 Renault Kangoo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 495 kg more than 2008 Renault Kangoo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Kangoo. (115 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2008 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | Tickford | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2610 mm |