1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (153 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 269 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt. (150 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
Model | Tickford | Cobalt |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |