1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2009 Daihatsu Sirion
To start off, 2009 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion. (101 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 588 kg more than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion. (140 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2009 Daihatsu Sirion | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Daihatsu |
Model | Tickford | Sirion |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2440 mm |