1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2009 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2009 Honda Jazz is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2009 Honda Jazz. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda Jazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda Jazz weights approximately 513 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda Jazz. (127 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2009 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Honda |
Model | Tickford | Jazz |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1339 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2510 mm |