1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2009 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Golf (207 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Golf should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Golf (281 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2009 Volkswagen Golf will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2009 Volkswagen Golf | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Volkswagen |
| Model | Tickford | Golf |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 207 HP |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
