1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (269 HP) has 164 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 45 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Kia |
Model | Tickford | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 269 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2845 mm |