1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2011 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2011 Renault Fluence is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Fluence (140 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 305 kg more than 2011 Renault Fluence.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2011 Renault Fluence | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
| Model | Tickford | Fluence |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 140 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4618 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1809 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2702 mm |
